Work In Progress 1: A grinding halt

Grind1
“This book, being about work, is, by its very nature, about violence – to the spirit as well as to the body…It is, above all (or beneath all), about daily humiliation. To survive the day is triumph enough for the walking wounded among the great many of us.” -- Working, Studs Terkel

 

For the small group of readers of this blog, in case you may've been wondering, this has been a year of personal tragedy. Notwithstanding, I am grateful for the difficult but important spiritual lessons arising from this. This has also stopped in its tracks a project begun sometime last year which was meant to culminate in a book of sorts.

Rather than confine into obscurity some of the interviews that came about for this project, I've decided to put them here. This is an unfinished and perhaps never ending project. But I thank all those who gave me their time and shared their views: and to you all I do apologise that your effort is not being given a larger audience.

The people interviewed are at least a year or so older now.

Below is the draft preface I had in mind of which an extract is posted.

Greed1
The preface that never was

A few years ago when visiting and staying with friends in Vancouver, Canada, I underwent an epiphany. I remember looking at the lovely view of English Bay, the mountains and downtown Vancouver all in one sweep from a penthouse view of a friend. As I was planning my day and the walk I would take across Granville Bridge to the downtown area and further on to visit some second hand bookshops, I recalled that if I were to traverse even further down I would be at the East End.

Part of the East End, which is next to Tinseltown cinema multiplex and Chinatown, was a very different side of the city. There not only will you find poverty but drug addicts shooting up openly in alleys in daylight. I remember once even seeing inert bodies lying in the middle of unclean streets which would over qualify for an archetypical movie setting for seediness. Police cars would drive by oblivious of the junkies and those peddling their addictive wares. The cops would not even stop to take a closer look at the bodies lying still in some streets to see if they had any life left in them.

I asked my friends what they thought of the remarkable contrast of the wonderful city and beautiful country they lived in with the inexplicable mess in the East Side -- this included mentioning to them the drug related violence in other parts of the city.

Most of the time my friends would give the answer that the reasons why this deplorable state existed was due to poverty in some instances and ‘wrong choices’ as the obverse side of ‘freedom’ in their land. Corruption among officials was also quoted as a perennial problem which also haunts so many other societies.

But let me give some more context to all this.

In 2006, I had dropped out of the System in the sense that I was not fully employed and had to live on a tight budget. This was not my first experience of such living but I did not realize that the economic hardship the world is facing was going to see so many others placed not only involuntarily in my position, but living on an even tighter budget.

In 2006 and 2007 I was on an extended meditation retreat at a Buddhist monastery in British Columbia, Canada. After the retreats I continued my stay there with friends before returning home to Singapore. The retreats were in a forested area where we lived off the grid but comfortable enough for most lay people to be able to adjust to. You did have to be sensitive to not frightening the lovely deers around the area and be cautious about running into bears, grizzlies too. I remember running into a couple of large grizzlies and standing perfectly still while recalling all the spiritual teachings I knew to stay calm as I was all alone on an afternoon walk in the woods. But on seeing a human, it was the grizzlies who turned tail and ran (they can really run, don't be fooled by the size).

Minutes later, I found empty bullet shells along the pathway I was on: some hunters must have been busy doing great PR work for humanity.

Later in 2007, I visited Sri Lanka when Colombo was in a near state of emergency with the then ongoing ethnic violence holding the island in its grip. With all the soldiers and armaments around in a quasi siege like atmosphere, I understood clearly why much of Nature has suffered at the hands of mankind. At that time I was also staying at a Buddhist monastery but was not on a retreat as such. I was taken to view a meditation centre that was being built in a beautiful hilly tea growing area and which I was supposed to live at as a coordinator of retreats in the near future.

This unfortunately did not work out in part due to funding problems for the meditation centre that delayed its construction and other issues that cropped up of a more bureaucratic nature that proved to be one obstacle too many. It is still being constructed.

Then in late 2008, I was on my third extended retreat this time in England. After the retreat I stayed with some family members who were residing in the suburbs of London. During the period of 2008 and 2009, due to certain experiences and some books that fell into my hands, I was propelled towards  many things including the project that has now led me to write these words.

...Some of the books that launched me towards my current project included Karl Marx’s Das Capital, Friedrich Engel’s The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844, Henry Mayhew’s London Labour and the London Poor, Jack London’s The People of the Abyss, George Orwell’s The Road to Wigan Pier and Down and Out in Paris and London, The Jungle (the unexpurgated version) by Upton Sinclair, Ernesto “Che” Guevara’s The Motorcycle Diaries (and his other major works), James Agee’s Let Us Now Praise Famous Men: The American Classic, in Words and Photographs, of Three Tenant Families in the Deep South, and William T. Vollmann’s Poor People to name the ones that come easily to mind.

...We have to see the people around us as our sisters and brothers and understand that we are all part of the collective consciousness of the planet. This means that no one who is underprivileged or living in poverty, even if it seems that they do so out of the choices they have made, should be left alone to bear the consequences and not receive any help.

We are truly indeed one another’s keepers and we should come up with new ideas to issue in a new paradigm of creating and measuring growth and move away from the browbeaten capitalist mode of competition at all cost, and greed over human dignity. We need to centre within our beings care for the planet, our environment, all living species and, above all, place the highest value on human beings over grasping for money.

The voices represented here are based on interviews with some people whom I know and those whom I do not. In many instances, I have let the people speak for themselves and that will be their way of directly communicating with you. They are speaking, in some cases, with much more thought put in than they would in a casual interview by someone who is just performing a journalistic function.

Not all those interviewed were comfortable in communicating entirely in English, but they managed what they could and I re-checked with them what they said before writing it up as quickly as possible on the same day I spoke to them from my usually verbatim notes.

Three basic questions were asked of all I interviewed and spoke to:

What is your idea of being poor?

What is your idea of abundance?

Why are people poor/What is poverty?

...Those who were not comfortable in English mainly responded to the last questions and as the dialogue went on I clarified what they said and they responded in their own way to the first two questions as well.

I had not read Studs Terkel when I thought of this project and began it, but was pleasantly surprised and impressed by the wonderful work he did as I started to read (among others while finishing my project) -- Hard Times: An Oral History of the Great Depression, and Working (people talking about their work).

The biggest influence on me probably came from sections of Marx’s Das Capital: Volume One, and the books by Engels, Mayhew, Orwell and London. I had studied formally philosophy and political theory as an undergraduate and over the years kept up with my reading. In graduate school I was steeped in literary theory and aesthetics. But only in recent times did I re-read many works I had studied and then some as the scales finally fell from my eyes.

The second part of this book looks at possible economic models that can be used for firms or enterprises of all sizes. There needs to be a move away from the way most businesses are run. In particular, we need to move away from how mega corporations are run with their obsession in serving profits and shareholders at the expense of the rest of the planet.

The time has come for this to change radically.

And so,

Grind2
Daily grindings

Madam Sawami (Aged 64, road sweeper, unable to retain her job after reaching 65. She has since been looking for work and I have no idea if she has been successful):

"I can work only now till 67 years old. So three more years. I want to be by myself. I want independence. My children and I, problems, cannot get along. I have my own problems don’t want to hear what their problems with their husband or wife. Then I must hear their wife’s problems also.

I want flat of my own, single room. I ask the HDB (Housing Development Board, Singapore) to help me and they say – you can wait, we have to help plenty people with no house living now on the beach. You have problem, they also have problem. What kind of help, this? Why can’t government help me? I have done nothing wrong, but government can’t help me in this, just to get a single room flat for myself.

What I earn, only $1000 one month…so I can pay installment say less than $100 a month, but please don’t take away $500 a month from me for a single room flat.

As long as I can work, help myself, have enough to eat, I am happy -- no one else will help, so I must help myself.

Now, I am alone. My children all forget what I do for them when young all, now see, I am on my own.

Can you help me with my house problem, I don’t know who [to] ask…HDB don’t want to help."

 

Mr Lam (Aged 62, food stall holder at a small hawker centre from which he rented his stall. The stall closed down as it was bought over by someone who has since set up a snazzy restaurant. No idea if he has since found another place to sell food):

"I come from a poor family. Many children, I am one of the eldest. My parents had a small stationery shop, and we managed, all of us. Now, my wife and me work at this food stall. We are not rich, if I can earn say $1,500 month I am happy, it is enough. We manage.

People who are rich -- say they earn $4,500 to $5,000 or much more…are they happy? Money is one thing, happiness something else. As the eldest in my family and myself, we had to be the bread winners to help my parents and sisters and brothers.

My family have the old Chinese thinking, the older ones sacrifice education all to support the younger ones. So my education highest – secondary 2…what to do. My English not so good, but I learn on my own by using English language tapes when I was 30 years old. I worked many things, like taxi driver and clerk in office. I also try to improve my English by speaking to those with good English, environment important to learn and practice language.

Because of my and my older brothers sacrifice, my younger sisters and brothers well educated. One of my brothers just retired as a teacher, he went to university. My daughter also is fine, she is working.

English is very important, the main business language. I think the government policy is correct, importance for English and own language or second language. Must balance with language for your own culture. But English is important. Now people can learn Japanese and French in school. Other languages very important. My younger sister learn Japanese at a language school and now she works in a Japanese company.

We were poor, but what is important is good family, happiness and health. Don’t always think of money, money, money! This rich people what happiness they have? If you are rich and happy, good for you. But most of them not like that. Everyday worry, cannot sleep, always thinking about how the business good, can make it, can make more money…all the problems of business…no peace of mind. So what if you have so much money?

Some people become poor because they don’t know how to save. They spend all the time, they want nice house, car, everything. Then when employment difficult, cannot get job, how? Cannot pay installments, become financial problems. You look at the young, they only want to have good time, spend, sports car, but never think of future, no savings. Then one day, if they cannot find work, what to do?

Some become poor because they gamble, throw away money. They think they will always be young or healthy and have a job. They don’t save. Gamble, then they lose all the money, so what to do?

The future cannot tell, cannot predict, better not to waste money and think no problems one day.

Also, I think sometimes people are poor, like in many very poor countries…because of karma. Their past life, many, many years ago, something they did, now they have to pay back. Hopefully after this life, it will be better for them.

Rich people should be generous, help the poor with donations, charity, not just here but help them in other countries also. What for keep all the money and don’t share? You cannot take with you when you leave [die], so why keep and don’t want to give?

The rich cannot enjoy life sometimes, they are so busy, so busy with time and making money. No time for family, loved ones, children…what kind of life? Even those who are top people like government, the ministers, no privacy? What kind of family life can they have, always their time is for someone else…their time and appointments all planned for them…what kind of freedom do they have?

I think I have enough, if I retire now still can survive. One of my customers who is rich and live in expensive condominium. He is 70 years old, and his wife is paralysed waist down and is in a wheelchair. He has two sons, both rich. None of them have time for him and his wife…they call on the mobile phone to find out…but too busy making money. They don’t care about their parents. So what for all this money?

When this old man tell me the story, he cry, the tears in his face as he tell me what his children are like. He and the wife are so lonely."

 

Ruwan (Aged 29, foreign worker, caregiver from Sri Lanka. Due to workplace exploitation and problems he returned home and his current situation is not known):

"People are poor because they sometimes are lazy. Not always because others at fault. They sometimes don’t know how to manage life. They throw money away and waste on things like drinking and women. Sometimes it is government’s fault why people poor. Government also don’t manage properly the country then whole country can be poor.

But to me, man is poor because it is own fault. Son from a poor family can actually do well if he studies hard in school and all, but also rich man’s son doesn’t do well because he is lazy and doesn’t want to work hard. What is important is the effort you want to have in things.

Sometimes religion can help explain all this. Like in Buddhism we are told life is dukkha, lot of suffering. So also karma is also responsible for our life. But during time of Buddha we are told there was lot of evil in world. Also people have different belief like worshipping the stone and water and all. But today, to me, also the same. When we pray to the statue we are praying to a stone or we belief in luck and things.

People the same even today from Buddha’s time till now. Now also we worship trees, water and earth. But this is not always a bad thing, sometimes this because we show respect for all around us. Nothing wrong with that. We are just grateful. Just as children who respect to parents or we show respect to our rice and food and drinking water, like in Sri Lanka, it is just a good habit.

Also, we can choose what we do, so not always karma to blame. We can choose to good or evil, we are responsible for choosing, so we are responsible also our life.

Money is important but it is not the most important. I think most important is happiness. If you’re not happy what for money? Most important is happiness to enjoy life but not waste time, meaning spend time to be happy with family and friends. That is what is important.

Nowadays when people supposed to smarter than animals, actually no difference. They are same. So much killing people do, they are not so clever. Why must there be so much killing?

In Singapore, people think money is number one. Everything is about money. People here are well to do, lot of money, money needed for everything here but parents no time for children. They put their time in money not the children. Main thing here is material things.

Children here always with maid, no parents spending time with them. So just as parents put children in nurseries because they no time for them, now children also put parents in nursing home because they also no time for them…all busy earning money.

Millionaire is not happy. He has worries like who will steal his money and property. Who can he trust? Will he loose all he have. Cannot sleep, no peace of mind. Poor man can sleep, if he has just enough for family he is okay…he doesn’t have so much problems and worry. No worry about who is going to rob him.

I see that in Singapore, it is like a car. Everything supposed to work well, very efficient, like car put in petrol make sure engine working then all is fine. But people here have no life. They are not happy, they have no time for family and friends.

My working place is a nursing home. Next to me is a child nursery. So I can see everyday what happens. They parents come and put the child in the nursery. Kids crying when hungry for mothers milk, but they get other milk not from humans. The cow is their mother because that is the only milk they get.

So I notice, parents come and put children in nursery then when children grow up they put parents in nursing home. I see and understand this for I experience this everyday. Singapore clients of my nursing home say what to do, they have to work to earn living and no choice but to put parents in home. They say in Singapore without money you cannot live, nothing you can do.

The parents have no time for children, and one day the children also no time for parents.'

Greed2
Wan (Izwan, aged 25, retail supervisor at a supermarket chain):

"What does being poor mean? I think if your parents cannot provide for you, then you’re poor. If you’re grown up and cannot provide for yourself, or don’t want to, then it is because you’re lazy – so again you’re poor. If you don’t want to be poor, then you must be hardworking and provide for yourself.

A lot depends on your capability and that also depends on your education level. If you grow up without much education then you are stuck with a low paying job. No education, no high paying job. Or you just have a mediocre job.

My education is ‘O’ Levels and I am trying to upgrade myself. You must upgrade and work for it, otherwise you only can blame yourself. I have two jobs, in the day time I help out here at the coffee stall next to this market. Evening time I work as a retail supervisor at a supermarket. That is the only way I can save and have enough.

With what I can earn I provide for my parents and am saving to get married and try to own my own home. Actually in Singapore you can get jobs, that’s not the problem. It is the need for money always. The cost of housing here is high. In the long run, your property is your investment, but to try to own one – maybe 30-40 years to pay the loan to just own your roof over your head. Then the interest for the loan will kill you. Trying to settle down here is hard. You have to remember you have to feed your family.

Religion to me helps in providing knowledge about the world and your life, I mean, it’s up to each person whether they want to follow what the religion says. But you must help yourself first. If you’re lazy and don’t want to help yourself, why should God help you? You help yourself, then God will help.

I think there are people who want to help those who are poor, but also a lot of wayang [Malay word implying 'theatrics'] taking place, making a big show trying to attract attention to themselves, like the charities here – the big ones – they make a big show. Also groups or companies, like that who donate want attention only just advertise themselves and promote themselves. If you’re genuine you just give, if you give don’t make a big show and all the publicity. They just want brand recognition.

I think if we have problems in Singapore, realistically speaking, most people won’t help each other. I read a lot of books on World War Two, you see what human nature is like, here or anywhere else. People tend to be selfish, they rather not help others. Focus on the individual only.

In this world you need money. To me if you have no money then you have no happiness. Money needed for everything. It can’t be avoided. The coffee and tea cups I clean up on these tables, you can drink from what is left over from them if you don’t want to pay for it. But then, someone already had to pay for it before you can drink the remainder in the glasses. Again, you need money to have anything.

In the end you must help yourself, you must be hard working and that also depends on your health. We need self responsibility in everything.

My father’s advice to me is bear your own suffering but don’t let others suffer because of you.'

 

Sam (Aged 63, barber):

"I have been barber since 1966. People are poor because sometimes they don’t want to work hard. You have choice, you can try and do your best or just give up. Work enough so that you at least have enough to eat. Some people are lazy, but they think they can get high paying job and also easy job. Younger generation now, some just don’t want to work, many don’t want to be barbers.

Some who are poor now actually only want to enjoy life, they spend money on woman and throw away money. No savings for rainy day. If I earn say $50 one day and spend $10 or $20 that day, the rest I save. Must save for old age. Don’t rely on government for everything, government here helps but in the end, you must help yourself.

Some younger ones today, no ambition, they see their father is a postman they follow him, don’t want to try and go beyond. They should study hard and upgrade and move up a little, but don’t want. In Singapore, if you cannot study well, hard to get good job. Here you must try to enter university then at least can earn $3 000-5 000 a month otherwise, how?

In Singapore you must pay for everything. Here there’s no large land area where you can have rice or things, if you cannot earn money then how to survive here? Government helps but again they cannot just give welfare always, we must also help our self. How else to pay for your food, housing and all.

To me health is important. No health you cannot work to earn money. You have money and no health, what for? No point. If you have health, not much money, still okay, can work.

One thing government here helps old people, at least the health and hospital care, they give some assistance to the aged. That’s a good thing.

Also we must respect all religions. Must have tolerance, and we must respect one another and not disturb each others belief. Again in Singapore, people do show tolerance of different religions. We should treat all people fairly, like our brothers, all are our family.

[At this point an Indonesia lady who is a foreign worker here and a friend of Sam’s family and came to visit them asked in Bahasa what the interview was about. She then added her views stating that in Indonesia and in Singapore only the poor help one another. She claimed the rich drive by and look down on the poor and blame the poor for what they are, not understanding that sometimes they can help. She then departed and the interview continued with Sam.]

Yes, I think all is a matter of attitude. Sometimes the rich here don’t want to help. They see poor people as different and separate from them. Must change the attitude. You find that people who have little to give are the ones who want to give, not always those who have plenty. We need more responsibility and kindness in our society. Not enough of it. [He used the Malay term timbang-rasa which means 'sympathy']

Have seen people in accidents and hardly the rich ones stop to help, the ordinary people seem to help mainly. But you must help, we must support each other.

Must be humble, not proud. That’s why I try to make my customers happy. I listen to them and do my best and try to provide service. In the work place must be professional, never mind what kind of work, must be the best, do your best. Younger people the attitude is different, they show they are unhappy and don’t know how to treat customers. That’s why I say, attitude is most important.

Also can’t blame God for everything. We have free choice, God gives us intelligence as humans so must think first, must think before doing things. Singapore now has some floods but actually in this case no point blaming government because it is act of God. But also there are poor people no homes have to stay on the beach. This is also wake up call for government to do more for those people who need some help.

I worry about bringing gambling into Singapore like casinos. People become greedy and try cheat and nothing good can happen from this. You know, I have one customer who works in the security of one of the casinos. He told me that in one day they catch usually 30 people – 30 people, you know – for cheating or trying to cheat. Foreigners and Singaporeans.

People do anything sometimes for money."

 

Anon. (Aged24, university student who has since graduated):

"1. What is your idea of poverty?

Poverty is entirely thought based for me as with everything else. I can be materially rich, but very very poor inside if I'm stingy, greedy, unhappy, etc. Likewise, I can be poor materially, but if my thoughts are calm and I can find happiness -> I'm rich. And sooner rather than later, my world will change to represent that abundance.

2. What is your idea of abundance?

Abundance is also a mindset to me. First in the mind then in matter. It is an attitude of gratitude, etc, etc, etc. That leads to a wonderful life affirming philosophy regardless of the pain that life can bring. Pain is necessary but that does not mean suffering is.

3. Why are people poor/why is there poverty?

This is very complex. I cannot understand sometimes why there is suffering and such debilitating poverty in Africa, South America or even in Singapore with the cardboard mattress 'uncles and aunties' [references to elderly people]. As in life can really be a very very painful sad experience for many people.

Some of poverty is created because of institutions which destroy our birthright to abundance and freedom and prevent information from being made public (that would eventually release our reliance on many things), but also some poverty is individual, just individual laziness, over reliance on governmental subsidies/or external care/support from children/parents, and leeching off of others' work. It's a human problem at the end of the day. And we do create the institutions that are reflective of our human flaws. Until we evolve out of our ugliness, poverty and suffering will continue to exist in this world."

 

Anon. (Aged 58, hotelier, now retired):

“1. What is your idea of poverty? Poverty in my eyes, is when someone does not have a roof over his/her or their head, hardly a job, no utilities whatsoever like electricity and water, unable to have access to decent medical facilities, barely have one meal a day, unable to send their children to school etc.

2. What is your idea of abundance?

Lavish and luxurious living, wastage and use of spending in a vulgar fashion; what I mean is - there is no harm in being rich and able to afford every materialistic need that is considered essential in such an instance. But to waste on lavish parties unnecessarily, (again, not my business) but it is sad to see such living, when the less fortunate can benefit from some of these monies. Perception of "Abundance" could be seen in different ways. In my life, I would pray for good health, and perhaps, my life may seem in abundance to some or of those less fortunate than myself. Abundance is where one does not need to crave for anything else, or have any more wants in life, e.g. a healthy bank account balance, travel frequently with enough expense money, good medical benefits, own luxury vehicles, homes which is evident in most cities in any country. There is so much more that could be added on to what is my idea of abundance.

3. Why are people poor/why is there poverty?

Could be born poor, lazy with no vision or ambition to improve this situation? See how people beg on the streets, when they could easily work in a house as a housemaid, houseboy etc. Just do any kind of work rather than beg!

(I have been a hotelier for 30 years, besides being a sister, sister-in-law, housewife, mother, grandmother, and being a citizen of a country which has an average standard of living...worked hard to do what may be seen as abundance in the eyes of some).”

 

The Awakened Eco-nomy

Media_http1bpblogspot_fbfrd

The Awakened Eco-nomy

Or, The End of Communistic Corporationist-Capitalism (CCC)

U2’s latest album No Line on the Horizon has a catchphrase that appears through most of the songs – “Let me in the Sound”. But the phrase that may appear in this post regularly is: “When will people finally wake up?” Not as graceful as U2s one liner, but no doubt either Bono or a George Harrison could turn up a good song to go with it.

But to the task at hand. A little effort and thinking will show that what is termed as Capitalism, “free enterprise”, “free market”, and “competition” under the guise of Democracy is only an insidious subtle subterfuge that has bamboozled billions of people for a longer period of time than the so-called Communists of yesteryear.

For detailed background information behind the ideas in this post please check out:

Interdimensional Economics (Part 1)

Interdimensional Economics (Part 2)

As is the case with all things that are part of the natural order of this organic universe, world and life forms it contains anything that is imposed, false, mechanistic and full of skull-and-bones-duggery finally gets shown up for what it is. So the current economic unraveling and Great Financial Reckoning we are in the midst of is a sign of better things to come as we rid the planet of not only toxic assets by banks, but the toxicity of the greed and duplicity of Capitalism.

The irony is that now that Communism is to all intents and purposes dead, we can see just how much Corporationist-Capitalism is just the reverse side of the coin of Totalitarianism and Communism. Far fetched, you think?

Take a close look at the key characteristics of the erstwhile Soviet Union’s Communism and our Communistic Corporationist-Capitalism (CCC) today. The USSR was known (in the Cyrillic alphabet) as the CCCP, so our CCCs are just a 'P' short since they do not declare themselves a political party. The CCCs prefer to manipulate political parties and systems armed with the ideology of Capitalism

In the case of the USSR, its Constitution (the 1977 version) reads like the most democratic document of all time. It guarantees all kinds of rights from freedom of speech, to assembly and to the most democratic of activities. It claims to take its strengths from the proletariat citizens that make up the State. Yet we know how diametrically opposed the USSR actually was to any genuine democratic concerns.

The USSR had a system of Communist Party officials who were elected (there were hardly any other candidates offering a real choice) through the Party Congress, to the Supreme Soviet (highest legislative body) through to the Central Committee and its Secretariat from which the Politburo emerged. The Politburo was the inner sanctum of power and it had a Chairman/General Secretary heading it. Through a system of internal elections and bloodcurdling power struggles it decided who ran what and who had their fingers on the nuclear buttons of the military arsenal. The USSR called this a democratic system.

Look at our very own CCC. They have a group of shareholders (Central Committee) who apparently choose a Board of Directors (Politburo) who also have a Chairman. Sometimes it is an executive Chairman and you also have the CEO (either of whom can pass for the General Secretary) who is supposed to be the chief executive of the Corporate Apparatus. The Board can also co-opt other Apparatchiks from elsewhere if they can contribute to the money making ventures of the Board.

There is nothing democratic about this. Democracy is an operative term that denotes people power. The USSR had no people power but Apparatchik power that controlled the people in the most undemocratic manner possible all in the name of being ‘Democratic’. This is also known as a reductio ad absurdum.

The Communists claim to be a 'dictatorship of the proletariat', exactly the kind that would have made Marx wish he had been cremated as Engels was (so that there would not be anything left to roll around).

[Point of Clarification: The idea of a dictatorship of the proletariat was first mentioned by Marx and Engels. But their idea of it was as a transition phase from capitalism masquerading as democracy into Communism where there was a 'withering away of the state' and proper democratic freedoms settled for all without any state coercion.

Lenin's idea of such a 'dictatorship' and end of state coercion followed similar lines and he was short on details as to what a Communist system would ultimately be. Lenin argued eloquently for his vision of the transitional 'dictatorship of the proletariat' in his seminal What is to Be Done and State and Revolution.

As Lars T. Lih brilliantly points out in Lenin Rediscovered: What is to Be Done in Context, Lenin was in all probability genuine in having a system free from all coercion and one that was just and fair for all, which involved a dictatorship of the proletariat being set up as an interim to his ideal political system (which he thought coincided with Marx's vision).

But the problem is that Marx did not live long enough to outline his ideal Communist system, and Lenin allowed things to slip out of his control. So while Lenin deserves credit (with Trotsky) for offering dynamic and visionary leadership, the sad fact remains that they also have to answer for what went wrong in the USSR and for having blood stained hands in allowing for the execution of political opponents, 'reactionaries' and the convenient massacre of the Tsar and his family. They were thereby responsible for the monstrosity that followed in the wake of Stalin.

But as I have been trying to show in the earlier posts called Interdimensional Economics and as I hope to explore in subsequent posts: the ideas of those like Marx, Engels, and Lenin can be realised in their highest form of good if taken to a different paradigm. This would involve taking a metaphysical basis to things as well as looking at what a real democracy looks like without resorting to dictatorships of any kind. But these would be ideas that Marx and Lenin would have objected to because for the former it involved 'metaphysics', and for the latter it involved 'democracy' which was a distasteful ideology for Lenin (who in turn ironically resorted to ideology to put forward his views).

The point being made here is that the Communist verision of the 'dictatorship of the proleteriat' as was known to the world was one of the worst forms of totalitarianism in human history]

The lovable CCC creates a dictatorship of selfishness, greed and egomania (We will come to the profit motive soon). Now here comes the revealed sleight of hand of the CCC after the demise of the Soviet bloc. Once the latter had collapsed economically and politically, and the West no longer had the opportunity to contrast their product of so-called western democracy against the so-called non-MBA trained Communist bloc, the CCCs could sell and effectively market its own agenda of world domination of markets and human beings under the guise of “free enterprise”, “freedom” and “democracy”.

With the major Communist competitor out of the way, the western democracies formed an Oligopoly. It was now a matter of seeing who won the game between themselves in creating a Monopoly.

(China poses special problems here because it is anything but a Communist state these days).

So all the so-called free enterprise CCCs came out of the woodwork and before long embarked on merciless and blatant mergers and acquisitions that made anti-trust laws seem heaven sent. While heralding wealth and prosperity for all (meaning the CCC Nomenklatura), the drive for aggression and domination created a whole system that is skewered against any form of financial or economic stability. The CCC lust for power and money fosters not market equilibrium but disequilibrium for that is the only way to be a monopoly.

The USSR had their power elites who cornered the ‘market’ of privilege and showed us the truth of Orwell’s prescient “Four legs good, two legs better” dictum. These happy folk were known as the Nomenklatura.

The CCCs have their own elites with all their privileges and private jets and indecent bonuses at the expense of all honest working men and women who are usually honest taxpayers too. The CCC nomenklatura seek to unduly influence decision makers, legislators, the media (which they largely own) to keep their ruling class in sovereignty over everyone else preferably as unjustly and unfairly as possible.

Some years ago when Microsoft was starting to really earn its reputation as a bully in the market, Bill Gates actually admitted that he was interested in biographies and, at that time, was deeply immersed in one on Stalin. He was not reading about Stalin to learn about better business practices, but probably on monopolizing control of things. So Comrade Stalin would have been a good fellow to study.

Just as the USSR sought to spread its ideology and control over the globe, that is exactly what CCCs have done in infiltrating and destabilizing the world and national economies all in pursuit of its own blinkered ideology: the profit motive. And they quote misguided neo-classical economists and their practitioners today to come up with the right kind of mumbo-jumbo to support corporate takeovers wherever and whenever possible with ruthless removal of all competition. Apparently that is what competition means – liquidating the other guy whenever feasible (pun fully intended).

Think about it. In a so-called democracy today, how is it that the entire economy, politics and lives of people are subject to the dictates of CCCs, what they do, whom they hire and who are part of their Politburo and Central Committee of shareholders? Not to mention allowing the world’s economic fate to be affected by what their nomenklatura desires.

So much of what we see that has happened in the entire economic cycle of inevitable booms, busts, currency devaluations, mass unemployment, poverty, human abuse, wars and conflicts have been caused by unelected apparatchiks who’s goal is the profit motive. There is nothing democratic, free or fair in business apparatchiks claiming to serve “democracy” when all they do is serve their greed and interests of their shareholder central committee members.

CCC elements buy and corrupt politicians to ensure that legislation is produced to serve the interests of their structure and apparatus. We are talking their politicians at home and abroad.
All this to serve the ideological God of the Profit Motive (the new name for Mammon of old, you remember him, surely).

As most of humanity is plugged into a system where their material needs are dependent on selling their labour power (since that is virtually all anyone has to sell) to make a living, nobody really questions this worship of Mammon-Profit Motive. In fact, this is usually not just out of ignorance but out of fear from the perception of what the CCC apparatus might do to them in terms of leaving them out in the cold to starve.

But these very activities of the CCC are now what is causing all the economic instability in the world, not to mention coming to terms to the incalculable damage done to the environment and our beloved planet.

When will people finally wake up…?

All attempts by CCCs to pay lip service to protecting human dignity, or the environment, is done so as to continue serving Mammon-Profit Motive. Let’s not be fooled here. Every tax incentive that is sought, every CCC loophole that is gained via manipulation of the media and politicians and connivance of banks is done at the expense of human beings and national interests. What is so ‘free and fair’ or democratic about a system that allows tax loopholes and privileges to be wrangled out by CCCs at the expense of the average tax payer (that is, the mass majority of respectable citizens). Somebody has to pay for all nomenklatura privileges of the CCC, and for some reason it seems it has to be you and me.

So tax payers continue to pay taxes, take on heavy loans and work themselves to near death while the CCCs and their top honchos continue to evade taxes so as to gain even greater bonuses for themselves. In other words, you get to support the CCC worship of Mammon-Profit Motive and also get to call your society a ‘democracy’: now that sounds like a two-in-one offer that’s hard to resist.

Bear in mind that the entire advertising, marketing, and media industry (with few exceptions) are honed to titillate the senses, negativity, fear, anxiety or the ego in service of Mammon-Profit Motive. Virtually all such industries in the media are under CCC control in one form or another, so they DO NOT serve the interests of the people but that of the CCC Politburo and Central Committee and careerists within the industry who hope to rise as Apparatchik.


Then we have the high priests of Mammon-Profit Motive, the Banking industry. The major banks are in absolute cahoots with Big Business and play a part in creating the distinctive self centered nature of the CCC beast. Essentially, all profits made from paying working people lower than they deserve in the productive process of commodities, is stashed away/invested in banks by CCC elements. The stash is then loaned out to all of us which we then have to repay plus interest.

So we are loaned the money we helped make and for which we now pay back with interest. Is there any wonder why the whole world is in debt? This is the gift of the CCC structure – a debt based economy. And when the loans are called in due to ‘toxicity’ of banking assets or otherwise, we all have to pay the price. Those who are in lower income groups or at subsistence level living bear the brunt of the economic crashes created by the CCC apparatus.

Take a break and watch these clips:

Capitalism 101

Capitalism Primer

Full Version

Capitalism Hits the Fan


Next comes a term that is well used within the USSR system, that of the interlocking directorate. Heed these words by Charles Timberlake:


"THE PARTY CONTROLLED THE GOVERNMENT. In fact, it functioned as THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. The “government” (described by the Constitution of 1936) functioned not as a legislative body the Constitution alleged, but merely as the EXECUTIVE AGENCY that implemented decisions made by some 12 to 13 people who composed the Political Bureau (Politburo) of the party. But, the people who held the most important government positions were also members of the party organ that made the decision. Having made a decision, party and government officials passed commands downward through parallel party and government hierarchies. At every administrative level, the party committee (which always included the head of government for the administrative region) met to discuss the command, and then passed the commands downward, through the same parallel party and government structures, to the party and government officials at the next administrative level below them. Thus, the Party Politburo adopted legislation. It then implemented those decisions through two parallel, hierarchical bureaucracies that had---at every administrative level—interlocking directorates. We may accurately refer to this relationship as 'the Bolshevik Party and its government.' ” (italics and highlights mine)


What this means is that CPSU members (Communist Party of the Soviet Union) who were in the Politburo, Central Committee and other organs of the party or state, had a wonderfully incestuous relationship via sitting in one another’s committees. So you would have members of the military who would be members of the CPSU, Central Committee, and Politburo, etc. This was a way to exert ideological thinking, control, as well as self-aggrandizement throughout the system. To say that this led to cronyism is to put it lightly.

Guess what? The CCC boasts of having an interlocking directorate system in which board members sit on other boards, which include politicians and people of influence. This is apparently in the interests of ‘democracy’, the ‘free market’ and ‘free enterprise’. While the rationale for such a notion was sold as being a way of maximizing synergy, it is really a way of cronyism, self aggrandizement and ideological control more than anything else. The CCC barons of today more than the dead Stalinists of yesterday, are the exemplars of Lenin’s dictum: “Who? Whom?”

This was an elegant expression for ‘who exercises power over whom’ in that the old school Communists, and the CCC exponents throughout history, are proponents of the master-slave set-up. Guess who fills in which roles? (When will people finally wake up…?)

The USSR had a system of summary executions (liquidation) of dissenters especially in its Stalinist heydays. The CCCs in the spirit of ‘free enterprise’ and ‘democracy’ summarily fire staff with only a day, or less, notice.

Many of us are aware, even as we read these lines, of layoffs by private firms that see to it that those relieved of work are sent down and out with their shoe box of personal items summarily in hand, and made to walk right through the front door without a chance to even say good bye to a single colleague (except the one who was laid off with you). The reason is that there is the fear that you may sabotage office equipment or cause dissatisfaction among staff etc if you are treated humanely and given a proper notice that you have been terminated. Worse, you may ‘steal’ stuff that can be used by a competitor!

And we do not even need to look into the arena of CCC politicking and backstabbing which may make some communist parties look anemic.

Mammon-Profit Motive serves self interest and involves the indubitable exploitation and theft of others’ effort and lifeblood to sustain untrammeled greed at the expense of all life forms and our planet itself. It promotes cynicism, doubt, and a nihilistic worldview.

If the state of humanity and the world as seen through events of the 20th century is insufficient testament to the effects of nihilism, just read any of the major novels by Dostoevsky to get an idea of what it is all about.

Incidentally, the nihilistic worldview of extremists like Nechayev had gone quite some way to evolving the kind of ruthlessness and brutality that stalked behind the likes of Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky.

So much for the Mammon-Profit Motive: if there ever was a system based on insecurity, fear, vindictiveness and sheer lack of integrity it is what we call capitalistic ‘private enterprise’ today.


Thought Experiment

Media_http4bpblogspot_xeoai

Try this exercise. Imagine you have suddenly discovered, and see in the clear light of day, that you live in a world in which a group of people belonging to a set of ideological beliefs need to protect their interests above all else (try, perhaps it is difficult, but try).

It is a world in which technology has been used to control and influence your mind and that of others on the planet. Let’s say They can instill in you the desire for unbridled self indulgence, fear, anxiety, hatred, divisiveness, a sense of separateness from others, despair and anger so that you become a kind of automaton, a mechanized man, woman or youth subject to their manipulation.

This entire structure of control is created for the sole purpose of keeping the mass majority of people subservient to the dictates of a nomenklatura. And you either join the Controllers or you will be liquidated by them one way or another (or simply be worn out by ‘life’).

What would your reaction be? How long will you tolerate this subjugation of your loved ones, yourself, your friends or anyone for whom you had a shade of caring for?

Yet this is exactly the system of the CCC we have been connived into buying with the full and, in many cases, willing participation of the media. Communism ‘lost’ because something more subtle and soul destroying ‘won’. But like all mechanistic set-ups, it has run its course in an organic universe and world.

Nothing can beat the laws of Nature. The mechanized CCC clones are only finally realizing that the system they created is collapsing around their ears. There are NO laws in economics: it is one of the greatest frauds perpetuated on humanity.

There are only laws of Nature. There is not one theory of Mammon-Profit Motive that can beat the law of gravity. And the CCC tower of Babel is coming down, hard.

At the moment of this writing, the US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has said that unless insurance mega corporation AIG is bailed out via taxpayers $ a “global financial meltdown” may occur. Stop the press! Did he say “global financial meltdown”?

Now kind reader, please ask yourself how on earth did we get to a stage where some crummy firm holds the fate of the global economy? Is this kind of a situation a reflection of democracy and can it ever have been geared to protect the interests of the people? The CCC structure is so top heavy with the centre of gravity so stacked in an ungodly manner in favour of its nomenklatura that the toppling of this ungainly edifice causes the world economy to tumble as well.

If there are right thinking people left on the planet, they should be asking why does this situation exist at all.


A Social Kind of Economy

Media_http1bpblogspot_ozbax

So where does that leave us? Actually, with good news all around if we choose to act on it. Where we need to go is towards a social kind of economy which is a community based one. This is not socialism or any other ‘-ism’. Do some research and you will find more than you imagined that is available out there on this. One such example of building sustainable communities is the Transition Town.

The key here is this – we move away from Mammon-Profit Motive to sustainability. So the basic rationalization of any commercial set up is one that is modeled like a social business in which its bottom line is sustainability, NOT profitability. It must be stated that the term "profit" when used in the context of a social business means "sustainability" not Mammon-Profit Motive.


But the difference between a social business and commercial venture of the Social Economy is that while a social business aims to cover costs and sustains itself and staff and can be perhaps seen as a welfare enterprise (e.g., eye clinics, providing basic food stuff, health and social insurance etc), a commercial enterprise in the Social Economy can aim for higher revenue as part of sustainability.

What this means is that it is not aiming for profit, but can aim for surplus sustainability. So such a firm would take whatever earnings it receives over and above its basic sustainability, that is, the bottom line of what would have qualified as a social business; and place that into a sustainability fund. This fund would be shared out equally or at a pre-arranged ratio (agreed to prior to setting up of the enterprise) among all those who work in the firm -- this means all workers/staff and managerial officers. The only owners in this firm are the workers, staff, executives and supervisors.

There is no need for bonuses or bizarrely high pay for anyone. Managers will earn as much as workers or perhaps more depending on the agreement by those who set up the firm. In the case of large firms the government, local governments and those who are part of the firm will be the shareholders. The entrepreneurial folk and banks are invited to join in and/or hired depending on how people want the set up to work.

There is voting at different levels of the community to ensure maximized democracy and a stake in the system and the commodities produced. This can be worked out according to each society to fit its needs and context so no gridlock of approval/voting need take place. What with the Internet, a lot of the choices made by people can be expressed via online procedures as well.


Please bear in mind that online voting procedures would refer to situations in developed democracies. In the case of poorer states, social businesses will take care of the needs of the underprivileged and those lacking in education etc.

All commodities and means of production will be aligned to what the country and its people determine as GPF solutions, that is, Green and People Friendly Solutions. The nature of the workweek, workday, relationship between colleagues and the relationship to what is produced for people within a country or for export, will be aligned towards respect for human dignity and the environment.

This is well within our reach if we put our hearts and minds into it.

Some of the changes that would be required would be:

  • Overhaul of national and international laws pertaining to the banking industry

  • Overhaul of national and international laws pertaining to firms and enterprises. No firms will be given the protection, loopholes or incentives that are currently in place which are manifestly against the interests of human dignity, lack all compassion, and desecrate the environment

  • A detailed study of what aspects of Islamic financial principles can be used effectively here (e.g., such principles can be applied in creating the sustainability fund mentioned, its contractual basis, as well as its operative procedures). The reason for looking into such principles is because the whole commercial enterprise in Islam is meant to have a system balanced with Divine Law, justice, fairness and compassion. It is also an effective way to make the Islamic world part of a revamped global economic enterprise. Islamic economics is taught at a number of universities worldwide and material on it is readily available everywhere

  • Removal of all interlocking directorates. There may be a situation that warrants, if at all, a person sitting in two firms holding an official post in each but it cannot go beyond that. This is to minimize cronyism, group think and corruption (to say the least)

  • Removal of stock exchanges and any semblance of gambling in the economic growth of nations or their currencies

  • When in doubt bring in members of the community etc to discuss and settle an issue through a vote. People who sit in on these groups are voted in by their communities as part of regular local elections. This allows for full accountability and transparency. It is also surprisingly democratic. This is what is meant by People Power: not that which is disruptive, but that which is constructive and aligned to the positive energy of GPF solutions

  • Communities are empowered to ban all forms of advertising, marketing and media. They can allow them in or create their own based on what suits their values. Creation of citizen journalists who report fairly, well researched and boundary pushing news with the welfare of the community and society at heart. No more answering to egos and CCC type dictates

The role of government is one of synergy and one that not only provides national leadership, but also complements and supplements the feasible and viable efforts of citizens in whatever projects and enterprises the citizens ask the government to come on board.

Also needed is a political system, at least in developed democracies based on the principles of Justice as Fairness as proposed by Rawls. John Rawls’s ideas of political constructivism allow for people to use their interaction and lessons learnt from an overlapping consensus created by state or society from which is derived the political principles that will govern their society or community.


Similarly, we can now have something called economic constructivism which allows for a similar process in which a society and communities allow for social economy type enterprises to flourish to sustain and support the citizens of a country as well as take part in synergistic regional and international trade devoid of practices meant to undermine the ‘competition’. The new type of competition promoted here is a just, fair, and compassionate one that allows each state, society, or community to build on strengths and advantages which allow the import and export of commodities which create a win-win situation for all concerned.


So rather that comparative or competitive advantage, we have sustainable advantage which allows nations to have a system of trade that allows for social economy firms and businesses to maximize their potential while allowing fair and beneficial exchange of commodities. Returning to the societal and community level, some aspects of the process of economic constructivism would lead to maximized creative endeavours which should lead to the creation of necessary and meaningful work that sustains an economy and society.

This would entail initiatives involving

  1. local/complementary currencies (e.g., Time Banks)

  2. barter exchanges

  3. the really really free market type activities

  4. volunteer based set ups and organizations that involve schools, youth and social economy businesses/firms, governmental organizations, and NGOs

There is no reason why the four aspects above cannot be applied to regional and international trade in an extended sense. All it takes is political will. But to do that it takes people electing the right type of leaders and holding them accountable in public office. Which means there is not much room for a slacker citizenry; People Power involves a fully participatory democracy of people who are mature, tolerant, and willing to accept responsibility for their decisions.

 And from that point on, any blame for things that don’t work must be leveled at the source for that which has allowed things to happen in each society: the image in the mirror when you look into it.


Eco-nomics

Media_http2bpblogspot_cuuvc

In order for any system to survive in a healthy, balanced and sustainable manner, it would do best to mimic or be one with the organic nature of the universe, world and life on it. This means ecological balance.


The social economy proposed here is one of creating an economic ecosystem or Eco-nomy that fits into the way the world actually works according to the law of nature, and not some bizarre mechanistic imposition serving the fallen angels of Mammon-Profit Motive.


A system of empowered people and a decentralized economic web of being will allow for communities to fit into the national organism of state, and allow the latter to grow and live in harmony and balance with its communities and citizens. This is the true nature of a synergistic, collaborative, synchronistic and symbiotic relationship which may be possible in a society. Recycle all those irrelevant management textbooks as they serve Mammon-Profit Motive and we do not need them anymore.


With an eco-nomic system, we no longer have the unnatural high centre of gravity of the CCC hierarchy which leads to silly statements that the world economy is in peril because some lousy firms show just how lousy they really are. An eco-nomic system has a well spread out centre of gravity that provides for stability all round.


Just watch the give and take of nature and how balance can be maintained for the benefit of all. But you do need gardeners, which is why we need leaders who are just that -- not those who compel others to do what is against their own interest, but gardeners who nurture, cultivate, strengthen and beautify the garden politic.


The leaders we need today for tomorrow and beyond will be the Good Gardeners who tend to the Garden of State and maintain its balance, harmony and well being. Community based leadership and economic growth is a reflection of the kind of eco-nomic system we need for a just, fair and compassionate way of doing things. That’s why the notion of political and economic constructivism fits in perfectly.


We should look to creating an organic system of self adjusting principles and ways of doing things that allows for social, economic and political osmosis of ideas and goodwill between all people in a society and between nations.


We need to be like water: flexible, all encompassing, have miscibility (able to mix freely with all things), and have that special ability miscalled an ‘anomaly’. Water’s so-called ‘anomaly’ is this: that it reaches its maximum density as it approaches 4 degrees Celsius. This characteristic allows for the surface of large bodies of waters like lakes etc to freeze, while keeping that below in liquid form circulating within its internal convection cycle of well within 4 degrees Celsius: this is why fish can live below frozen lakes.


How is this possible, indeed. This is natural and cosmic law, not mumbo-jumbo economic ones. These are natural ecological parameters that allow for the sustenance of life. So an eco-nomy is one that corresponds to cosmic law: as above, so below.


Similarly, we need to learn from the flexibility, suppleness and cleanliness of water in allowing for the type of parameters within our societies which foster balance, freedom, fairness and compassion. We need to move away from the narrow, imbalanced and destructive concerns of the ego and look to the whole, thereby looking after the interests of all within it. This calls for a self adjusting, self regulating natural system of government and an open hearted way of doing things.

But empowerment comes at a price. It comes with waking up, getting real and growing up.

Then we will have started to create an Awakened Eco-nomy.

Live Long and Prosper!

Media_http3bpblogspot_ldcqi